PDA

View Full Version : Saskatchewan Rejects Mandatory Outfitting


HORNEYHUNTER
01-10-2007, 06:57 PM
Saskatchewan Rejects Mandatory Outfitting

WINNIPEG, Manitoba—Delta Waterfowl has been informed that the government of Saskatchewan has rejected a proposal by the Saskatchewan Outfitters Association (SOA) that would have required non-resident hunters to hire a licensed guide or use an unpaid host while hunting in the province.

Hugh Hunt, executive director of Saskatchewan Environment’s Resource Stewardship Branch, said in a letter to Delta, “A recent review by Saskatchewan Environment has resulted in the conclusion that it is inappropriate to implement mandatory outfitting for non-resident bird hunting.”

Delta contacted the Saskatchewan government and issued a press release in opposition of the proposal, which would have applied to everyone who was not a Saskatchewan resident.

“We applaud Saskatchewan Environment for its decision,” says Delta President Rob Olson, who publicly opposed the proposal in his President’s Message column in Delta Waterfowl magazine. “The proposal by the outfitter associations is not the best long-term solution to the conflict, and Delta does not support it,” Olson wrote last year.

Olson praised the Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation and Executive Director Darrell Crabbe who worked alongside Delta in opposing the outfitters’ proposal.

In February of 2005, the SOA published a paper in which it proposed that non-residents would be required to hunt with a paid guide or be accompanied by an unpaid resident hunter-host who would not be allowed to carry a gun.

The SOA paper portrayed illegal outfitting as a major problem on the prairies, a contention that was vigorously disputed by Delta’s Vice President of Policy for Canada, Dr. Robert Bailey.

Robert D. Sopuck, Delta’s vice president of policy for prairie Canada, predicted the proposal would hurt the economies of rural communities across the prairie provinces. Sopuck also pointed out that mandatory outfitting would jeopardize access to hunting land for residents and non-residents alike.


http://www.deltawaterfowl.org/pr/2007/070108_sask.php

bufalobill
01-10-2007, 08:00 PM
Finally the Calvert crew got something right.

Now if they would fix the draw system, all would be right in the world!!!

str8shtr
01-10-2007, 10:21 PM
I agree 100%. Whats wrong with the draw system? And welcome to the site.

SilentArcher
02-06-2007, 04:54 AM
The draw system needs to be changed so that every year you don't get drawn in Super A pool you gain a preference point. Lots of states and I know Alberta as well do it and it is a lot better system than we have. There wouldn't be guys not getting drawn after 10 years applying while others that are luckier get drawn first year Super A. Would be a more fair draw system than what we've got now. IMO

Bearhunter
02-06-2007, 09:05 AM
I am an outfitter, and I agree 100% with this decision.


Some outfitters believe that free roaming US hunters have changed the migratory scene. There also has been some bad press about poaching and careless behaviour from US hunters. This behaviour is not in any way shape or form relative to all the US hunters that come to Saskatchewan. I can attest to that. They have the love of the outdoors like we do, and respect the landowners and animals they hunt.

I don't feel outfitters should have the monopoly on non resident hunting. Non-residents throw SO MUCH money into the rural economy its amazing. Many hunters would not come if they had to pay a guide. Then alot of small towns would suffer in September and October.

Then who would get guide licenses? The 10 outfitters in each zone, many of which aren't actively guiding, couldn't handle the influx of hunters needing guides.

Thank you SWF for your lobbying on this issue...

rvsask
02-06-2007, 10:14 AM
I'm glad to hear this. I was concerned for small town Sask when they started to pondering this policy.

str8shtr
02-06-2007, 10:25 AM
I like the idea that if I come back to visit some friends and we go bird hunting, I would like them to be able to hunt with me. If they couldn't shoot, I wouldn't bother buying a license.

tiller
02-06-2007, 11:26 AM
I agree 100% with SilentArcher on the draw system it should be on a priority system , not the luck of the draw...

HORNEYHUNTER
02-06-2007, 11:30 AM
I personally think its great, you know just about how long it will take you to get drawn for some animals, if you do not want to hunt this year, because you will not get holidays.. having a child.... you can 999 the system and do not lose your priority

bufalobill
02-06-2007, 12:07 PM
A little OT from the original post, but here goes anyhow.

SE needs to implement another priority level in the current draw system.

Currently there is Super A, A, B and C.

Four pools.

If you look at the numbers, (online pool application numbers available at the SE website) the system would be made more fair, in most zones, by adding a fifth pool. I know guys that have been in the Super A pool for 3-5 years before getting drawn. By adding a fifth pool, you would increase the likelihood of drawing 100% of the Super A pool, and the remainder of the tags available from the A pool. These tags out of the A pool would be then "just luck of the draw", rather than the Super A being lucky.

Being able to 99 would still be available to advance your pool status, and should you miss a year of application, you would only drop one pool and stay there for a period before being dumped from the applicant pool all together.

The only thing this would change is the luck involved in being drawn from the Super A. This would not change the frequency of being drawn, only make it more predictable.

While I'm dreaming, I want Sunday hunting as well. :shade: :thumbs_up

djhunter
02-06-2007, 12:31 PM
a agree on the outfitting decision hands down

bobcat
02-06-2007, 12:58 PM
Our draw system in AB is pretty good. You know where you stand from one year to the next. eg, I know I have to wait 7 yrs for antelope appox. and 3 yrs for bull elk in my area. The one thing I do like is if I dont get drawn I can get a land owners draw as long as you own 160 acrces or more for certain species...mule deer buck..cow elk..but you have to put in for that animal. If I put in for bull elk I cant get a cow land owners.

drew_novak
02-07-2007, 02:48 AM
I think that Saskatchewan has a lot of great hunting and fishing to share with others. My only concern is the ones that come into this provence and shoot 200 to 300 birds in a week and leave them in garbage bags on the side of the road. That pisses me off. But ya good on Sask Government on the ruling!